Construction Investment Manufacturing Municipal Real Estate Technology
Construction
[top]
Enhance the Benefits for Investors in Your Company
Virginia provides a limited tax credit to individuals who invest in small businesses by purchasing equity or subordinated debt with a term of at least three years. The Commonwealth of Virginia maintains a $5,000,000 pool of tax credits to be shared by investors in qualifying businesses. In order for your investors to participate in this pool, your company must apply to the Commonwealth of Virginia and receive certification as a qualifying business prior to the investors’ investment.
Investors will be allocated credits to be applied to their Virginia income tax in an amount of up to $50,000. The exact amount awarded to each investor will not be determined until after the end of the taxable year when the Commonwealth allocates the pool among all qualifying investors.
To apply for your business’s qualification, complete Form QBA, which can be obtained at www.tax.state.va.us.
For more information regarding this opportunity, or questions regarding venture capital legal issues, please contact Vince Mastracco.
Publications:Sarbanes-Oxley Act / Section 16 UpdateAmong its many sweeping reforms, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act") completely overhauled the reporting requirements applicable to officers, directors and 10% (or greater) shareholders under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Section 403 of the Act, which completely amended and replaced Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, is now in effect.
New SEC Rules Implementing Provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act"), the SEC recently adopted several new rules relating to audit committee financial experts, codes of ethics for certain executive officers, non-GAAP financial measures, furnishing earnings releases and similar announcements to the SEC on Form 8-K, disclosure relating to off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations, and trading in a company's equity securities by insiders during a pension fund blackout period.
New SEC Rules Regarding Disclosure Controls & Procedures and CEO/CFO Certifications
As directed by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”), the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recently adopted final rules requiring principal executive and financial officers of every public company to certify to the financial and other information contained in the company's quarterly and annual reports.
Disassembling International Contracts: Dispute Resolution
In our last issue of the International Business Advisory, we discussed the legal nuances and complexities surrounding the assembly of international agreements, specifically sales contracts. In this issue, we consider the risk and expense that vex the disassembly of such contracts, specifically the resolution of transnational disputes between the contracting parties.
It cannot be denied that the risk of nonenforcement elevates when a contract takes on an international flavor. In brief, the main risk factors are as follows:
• the inability of a court to obtain jurisdiction over a non-resident party
• the court’s inability to compel discovery of documents and witnesses located abroad
• inconsistent rules and rulings between courts of different countries
• the legal and practical difficulties in serving legal process against an overseas party
• resistance to enforcing a United States court judgment in a foreign country
• potential defenses of "foreign sovereign immunity" and "Act of State".
The uncertainty surrounding how an international dispute will be resolved is one of the key issues that companies should consider before making a contractual commitment abroad. Obviously, the potential benefits of the contract — the projected economic return to the company — need to outweigh these risks. To the extent these risks can be minimized by negotiating favorable dispute-resolution provisions up front, then it is more likely that the parties will be able to pursue a mutually beneficial transaction.
To read more, please click here.
Attorneys’ Fees In Civil Rights CasesIn a significant case for the recovery of attorneys’ fees in civil rights actions, the U.S. Supreme Court recently narrowed the definition of “prevailing party.” A suit was brought by a plaintiff who alleged that a West Virginia law violated multiple federal civil rights statutes. Thereafter, the West Virginia legislature abolished the law, and the district court dismissed the suit as moot. The plaintiff moved for attorneys’ fees and costs as a “prevailing party” under the “catalyst” theory, claiming that the suit achieved its desired result because it brought about a voluntary change in the defendant’s conduct. The Court defined “prevailing party” as a party “in whose favor a judgment is rendered, regardless of the amount of damages awarded.” To recover attorneys’ fees and costs, the Supreme Court held that a “prevailing party” must obtain a court-ordered change in the legal relationship between the parties and denied the plaintiff attorneys’ fees. The case is Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va. Dep’t of Health & Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598 (2001).
For more information about this subject, contact David N. Anthony.
Publications:Municipal Law Update - Summer 2002Newsletter authored by David Anthony and Shep Wainger. Articles include: Attorneys' Fees in Civil Rights Cases; Racial Profiling; Sexual Harassment; School Violence; Student Grading; and more.
Code of Virginia Governs Home Owners Associations Most homeowners who have purchased homes in residential subdivisions with mandatory homeowners associations are generally aware of the existence of such governing documents as the Declaration, Bylaws, Articles of Incorporation, Rules and Architectural Guidelines. What many homeowners in these associations may not realize is that there is the "Virginia Property Owners' Association Act," which governs many, if not most, of these mandatory associations. Although a large part of the Act is devoted to imposing disclosure requirements on sellers with respect to the sale of homes in neighborhoods that are subject to the Act, the Act has numerous provisions governing the operations of associations. For example, there are provisions that cover, among other things, access to association records, meetings of the board of directors, contents of association disclosure packets, adoption and enforcement of rules, flag display, special assessments, amendments to the governing documents, condemnation and liens. Also, of major importance to associations that are transitioning from developer control to owner control, the Act contains a provision requiring the developer to turn over certain documentation to the association upon transferring control of the association to its members. In some subject areas, the Act supplements an association's governing documents, while in others is supercedes or adds to an association's governing documents. Thus, from operations and legal standpoints, an association's board of directors must be familiar with and regularly consult the Act in addition to the association's governing documents. The Act comprises sections 55-508 through 55-516.2 of the Code of Virginia. The Act can be accessed at the internet address: http://legis.state.va.us, and selecting "Legislative Information System." Use the pull-down menu in the upper right hand corner and choose "Code of Virginia," then click "Go." Residents can also review a hard copy of the Act by visiting a local law library and selecting Volume 8 of the Code of Virginia or by contacting the Virginia Real Estate Board, 3600 West Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23230-4917. Or, easier still, simply call (804) 367-8500, and request a copy of the Act. For more information about this article, contact W. Hunter Old.
Publications:Critical Real Estate Issues for Credit UnionsE. Andrew (Andy) Keeney recently presented a seminar specifically designed to address the critical real estate issues faced by credit unions.
Buying a relatively small business, even one with few assets or little revenues, can involve complex issues that often come back to “bite” a buyer or seller, after-closing when the other party (and the money!) are off to greener pastures. A number of these issues are not easily recognizable to someone that does not deal with them on a daily basis, including knowledgeable businesspeople.
Before Investing in a Franchise
Franchising accounts for a significant volume of the goods and services sold in the United States. Franchises generate an estimated $1 trillion in retail sales annually and employ nearly 8 million people.
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Patent Protection You've just conceived of the world's greatest widget, the next it that will overcome world hunger, bring about world peace, and propel us far into the 21st century. How do you keep others from stealing your invention?Well, there are several options available to any inventor who wishes to protect his or her new and novel idea, but once you begin investigating the options, you will undoubtedly hear about disclosure document programs, provisional patent applications, non-provisional patent applications, utility patents, design patents, and even plant patents. Some of these available options will never provide you, as the inventor, with any enforceable rights, some provide you with a very limited, temporary "shelter", and some have the potential to mature into valid, enforceable U.S. patents. The difficulty often lies in trying to understand the nature of each of these options, the level of protection that each option ultimately provides, or more importantly does not provide, and whether your circumstances warrant the use of one option over the others.
Before we move any further, we should be sure to define three central concepts: what is a "patent", what are the patent "claims", and what is the "one-year statutory bar". A patent is a type of temporary monopoly granted by the government, to the inventor or inventors of any new and useful process, machine, article of manufacture, composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, or any new, original, and ornamental design for an article of manufacture. During the term of the patent, the patent owner can exclude others from making, using, or selling the claimed invention in the United States or importing the claimed invention into the United States, without permission. When the term of the patent expires, the claimed invention becomes public domain and is available for use without permission from the patent owner. In exchange for this temporary monopoly, the inventor must provide a complete disclosure of the potential invention and the best method he or she is aware of for making and using the invention.
Click Here To read complete article. New Business Start Up Ideas Choice of Entity for Start Up and Growing Businesses by Chuck McPhillips is a quick, easy read. Created to assist new investors, start up businesses and growing businesses in understanding some basics to consider when making plans, this article will answer some questions and offer alternate considerations.
Publications:Technology Ventures Legal Advisory - Summer 2003Articles include: Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights through Preliminary Injunction; Whether to File a Provisional Patent Application; Know Your Trademark Terminology
Stephen E. Story spoke before the Hampton Roads Tax Forum in February 2005. His presentation included a PowerPoint slide show.
So, you have a thriving _________________ (fill in the blank – restaurant, retail, service) business that is well-run, successful and making money. You have thought about franchising your business and wonder, what, exactly, does that entail. This article will give a very brief overview of the basics of franchising your business.
Intellectual property is the principal asset of many established and emerging technology companies. The licensing of these assets is big business: American companies collected nearly $18 billion in royalties and fees from trade in intellectual properties in 1991, roughly double the figure five years earlier.
Trade Dress Law of Product Configuration
Through much of the last two decades, companies made ever broader and more aggressive use of trade dress. Yet, two recent Supreme Court decisions – each decided unanimously – radically constrict the availability of trade dress protection, especially as it relates to product configuration.
This PowerPoint presentation, which discusses online contracting generally and Virginia's adoption of UCITA in particular, was delivered in 2002 at a Hampton Roads Technology Council "QuickLaw" program.
Intellectual Property - Protecting the Brand
The following outline and slideshow were presented at the 38th Annual Legal Symposium in Washington D.C. in May of 2005.
Not just for tech firms anymore
Most people involved in other than high tech businesses have seldom had to worry about patents interfering with their operations and profitability.
top of page
Home | Practice Areas | Employment | Outrageous Cases | Industry Buzz
Attorneys | Publications | Seminars | Diversity | Etc. . | Site Map
![]()
Chesapeake Office
524 Johnstown Road
Chesapeake, Virginia 23322
main number: (757) 546-8800
fax number: (757) 546-4120
Norfolk Office
150 West Main Street
Post Office Box 3037
Norfolk, Virginia 23514-3037
main number: (757) 624-3000
fax number: (757) 624-3169
Newport News Office
11817 Canon Boulevard, Suite 408
Newport News, Virginia 23606
main number: (757) 873-6300
fax number: (757) 873-6359
Virginia Beach Office
2101 Parks Avenue, Suite 700
Post Office Box 626
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451
main number: (757) 491-4000
fax number: (757) 491-4020
Williamsburg Office
4801 Courthouse Street, Suite 300
Post Office Box 6000
Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
main number: (757) 259-3800
fax number: (757) 259-3838
Hampton Office
2236 Cunningham Drive
Hampton, Virginia 23666
main number: (757) 224-2900
fax number: (757) 224-2949
Richmond Office
Three James Center, 12th Floor
1051 East Cary Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
main number: (804) 771-5700
fax number: (804) 771-5777
Copyright © 1999-2008 Kaufman & Canoles. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer